A lengthy and complex class-action anti-trust suit brought by plaintiffs William Twombly and Lawrence Marcus came to a conclusion on Tuesday with the US Supreme Court's 7 to 2 ruling in favor of Verizon Communications.
The original complaint filed in 2002 alleged that US ILECs (Bell Atlantic, which merged with GTE 2000 to form Verizon Communications) as well as several other large telephone companies restrained competition for CLECs and ISPs in two fundamental ways. They deliberately "engaged in parallel conduct" in their respective service areas to inhibit the growth of CLECs, including making unfair access agreements to their networks, providing inferior connections to networks, overcharging, and billing in ways designed to sabotage the CLECs' relations with their own customers. Secondly, the complaint charged that ILECs' had a "compelling common motivatio[n]" to thwart the competition, which naturally led them to form a conspiracy.
The conspiracy point at the heart of the lawsuit was held as more theory than reality according to Court's opinion delivered by Associate Justice David H. Souter.
» This story continues on page 2. Please click here to read
please sign in to rate this article
8025